As my profile shows, I like the Bowler card. I like him as a character, and he is much more versatile than people think.
I don't have a least favorite card because the only reason anyone would have a least favorite card would be that they have trouble countering it or using it and have decided that that makes it OP or bad. ;)
Please have this guy https://clashroyale.wikia.com/wiki/Message_Wall:Ryan_Montgomery stay off my recruitment thread. He is a former clan member we kicked for not being a culture fit and his posts on my thread are unwanted. Would also be helpful if you can delete his posts from my thread as they are false and slander. We do not kick for "no reason'. There is always a reason behind our kicks and if someone gets kicked we put in the kick message exactly why they were kicked. Thanks
Either an admin here rolled his veiled profanity post back or he deleted it. Either way I feel that since you are the owner of this wiki, you should not condone and indirectly encourage further disruption of the recruitment thread by taking no action when I first reported the issue. Thanks for letting us post here while we did, but it's time for us to move on from this forum.
I'm indifferent. None of the cards changed are in my deck or especially good at countering it, and more generally, I don't think it really changed much gameplay-wise. It just tweaked things to bring cards more into line. The only major change was the BBarrel, and I don't really see it being a decent alternative to The Log.
"Table of Contents" is like many other table of contents you find while reading non-fiction books. Basically in the context of the wiki, it provides quick links to each section of the page for the ease of readers, but here on this wiki it can feel a bit out-of-place especially when most articles (particularly those of cards) are not that long or have that many sections to necessitate such a table.
We have had those Magic Words on the article pages for years, and this is the first time that someone has raised an issue with them. I wonder what the consensus is on this topic. What do other editors think? Perhaps you should run a poll on the wiki's forum, or just ask other editors to reply here.
The main complaint is that the unability to edit edit from section headers makes it more difficult to track whatever the editor was interested in. Let's say that a change was implemented and you can now edit from section headers. You will still have to have memorised where your point of interest is, whether done by using paragraph number or content as reference. All that will have changed is that scrolling down a little is no longer necessary.
Of course, I do agree that it would be a minor quality of life change and I see no major arguements to prevent such a change (mainly because I haven't tried to find any)
I haven't practiced how to be formal in a longish time. Btw, having "Edit" on every section takes away from an article aesthetically imo
Can you tell me why the images of the tables of the tables on their pages if they have a multiple names do not appear? (ex. Goblins). I reviewed the codes and everything coincides perfectly. Im from Clash Royale Wiki Italian.T he images that have a singular name appear instead (ex. Lumberjack)